|
Bell Sonecor BE200HT Hands-Free Headset Caller ID Telephone | 
 enlarge |
Brand: Belle Sonecor
Category: CE
This item is no longer available
Avg. Customer Rating:  8 reviews
Media: Electronics
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1
Dimensions (in): 1.5 x 5.3 x 3
MPN: BE200HT
Model: BE200HT
UPC: 075668112006
EAN: 0075668112006
ASIN: B00004U49C
|
| Features:
| • | Flexible lightweight headset | | • | For use with most cordless and cellular telephones | | • | Includes caller ID capabilities | | • | Connects with 2.5-millimeter jacks | | • | Adjustable boom mic |
|
| Accessories:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.com Product Description
Attaching via a 2.5-millimeter jack (the standard for most cordless and corded phones), this headset allows you to talk on the phone with your hands free so you can work on projects while talking. Lightweight, the headset features a flexible, easily adjustable boom mic so you can make sure to be heard. The LCD is compatible with caller ID services, and is easy to read when the headset is clipped to your belt. Certainly not a top-of-the-line product, this accessibly priced headset is low on frills but high on value.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 3 more reviews...
 headsets keep breaking October 2, 2001
bought three within 6 months 2 of the headsets were broken
It's Worth The Price September 11, 2001
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
I use to have the Bell Sonecore BE-100HT until I dropped it one two many times and pulled the cord out of the headset. Just got the BE200HT today. Seems to work just fine. I am happy with it. Minor cons. Display contrast is low and hard to read straight on. It seems to be made to read at a low viewing angle. The volume control range is limited. It can be adjusted to between loud and near loud. It just does not have the range from low to high that my previous BE100HT did. The "belt clip" on the back is still the cheap plastic design that broke on my last one. I expect it will not last long on this one either. The write up on Amazon at the time I posted this still mentions cordless/cell/2.5mm jacks. All wrong. The picture is correct though. It is basically a hands free headset that connects with the phone cord and needs 4 AAA batteries. It is worth the ...price though. I am happy with it.
I wish it was cordless August 9, 2001
2 out of 2 found this review helpful
I really enjoy using this phone. It is really durable and the batteries seem to last forever, I just wish it was cordless.
I liked it until it broke February 15, 2001
13 out of 14 found this review helpful
I liked this phone a lot, but the headset broke within a week of use...I'm not a violent or frequent phone user! I substituted a regular handset on it for now. The description DID formerly say that it was cordless, you weren't imagining things. I still like the base of the phone: the caller ID, the call timer, the non-obnoxious ring, the adjustable volume, etc. Maybe I can buy or construct a new headset for it.
 It broke in one month of light use. December 21, 2000
20 out of 20 found this review helpful
The construction quality of this phone was very poor. I should have suspected that because it cost so little, but occasionally you can get a good buy. Not here, however. The headset broke after I'd had the phone for one month, and the part that broke was not easily fixable -- the joint between the microphone and earpiece. (I had also misunderstood an earlier version of the product description on here that suggested that the phone might be cordless, but I don't factor that into my criticism of the phone itself.) Recently, I gathered the courage to buy a Plantronics cordless, and it is in an entirely different class. I can't speak to other low-end phones, but after seeing what the extra money buys, you should think seriously about whether you want to skimp on a headset phone. The way that you use the phone -- putting on a headset, adjusting a microphone, perhaps walking around -- puts lots of stress on the construction, and a broken phone isn't worth what you paid for it.
| |
|
|
| |
