|
Lexmark 33S0100 Mono Laser Printer | 
 enlarge
|
Brand: Lexmark
Category: CE
List Price: $279.99
Buy New: $129.99
You Save: $150.00 (54%)
New (28) Used (1)
Avg. Customer Rating:  8 reviews
Media: Electronics
Autographed: No
Memorabilia: No
Operating System: Apple MacOS X
System Memory: 32
Modem: None
Shipping Weight (lbs): 33
Dimensions (in): 15.6 x 14.1 x 102
nv:Print Method: Monochrome Laser
First Page Output Time: As fast as 7.5 seconds
Resolution: 600 x 600 DPI
Maximum Duty Cycle: Up to 50,000 Pages Per Month
Print Speed: Up to 30 PPM
Special Features: Duplex Printing
Dimensions: 15.6"W x 14.1"D x 10.2"H
Protocols: N/A
Connectivity: USB 2.0
Connectivity: Centronics IEEE 1284 Bidirectional Parallel
Optional Connectivity: Lexmark N4000e Fast Ethernet (Print, Scan and Network Fax)
Warranty: 1 year warranty
MPN: 33S0100
Model: 33S0100
UPC: 734646013109
EAN: 0734646013109
ASIN: B000K1MVZQ
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Condition: BRAND NEW FACTORY SEALED BOX USUALLY SHIPS SAME DAY
|
| Features:
| • | Lexmark International | | • | E250d Laser Printer |
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Ideal for desktop users and cost-conscious small workgroups, the Lexmark E250d mono laser is compact, ultra-quiet and surprisingly affordable for a duplex printer - with no compromise to quality and performance! It's built to keep up with your demanding document needs, and it delivers professional output with crisp 2400 Image Quality resolution. Great for the environment and your budget, it includes integrated duplex printing to reduce paper waste and drive down costs.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 3 more reviews...
 Good quality, stable printer, but expensive ink February 12, 2008
4 out of 4 found this review helpful
I also have the E250dn (network attach model) and use it to print about 150 pages per month. I have had only two paper jams in that time (both my fault for not carefully stacking the paper) and they were easy to clear. Print quality is quite good. My chief complaint is that the cartridges are priced sky-high ($100+) and non-Lexmark branded "compatible" cartridges may not work due to the electronic chip-matching circuits required in the cartridge. The manufacture has placed this function (which adds cost) to prevent, or inhibit, use of non-Lexmark brand (i.e., expensive) print cartridges. I guess the cost of ink appears to be the only way the printer vendors make any profit.
 A Bargain at Any Price January 20, 2008
1 out of 2 found this review helpful
This is by far the best printer I've ever owned. I'm a middle-school teacher, and I use this printer in my classroom to run off handouts, instructions, and/or worksheets for over 120 students pretty much every day, and I've never had any problems with it. It's lightning-fast and looks really nice on my desk, too. My favorite feature, though, is the automatic duplexing for two-sided printing, which helps me save a lot of paper. I'm probably going to buy another one of these for home; after experiencing the joys of laser, I don't think I ever want to mess with inkjet printers again.
 a good soho laser printer November 2, 2007
i bought this to replace a lexmark e232 which quit after two years.. and then i learned that the e232 paper feed roller was substandard. while this printer is fine right now, who knows what will happen in 2 year? i found out later that folks on ebay sell repair kits for these printers.. so no doubt that will be an option two years from now.
Lexmark E250D Laser Printer October 18, 2007
1 out of 2 found this review helpful
This is an inexpensive excellent laser printer. Lettering is crisp. I recommend it.
Very pleased October 3, 2007
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
I also bought this printer for it's true duplexing capability. For it's price (very reasonable compared to other duplexing printers) I wasn't expecting great performance. But I have been delighted. It is very fast. Easy to feed single sheets (including small sizes like index cards). And I have only had problems jamming with one particular document (consistently with that document probably because of a software issue with that document). But I should add that I am not a high volume user.
|
|
|
|
| |
